Codify the rubric
Encode the criteria your reviewers already use. Weighted, evidence-gated, and versioned from the first save.
→Versioned rubrics. Calibrated judges. One standard your team can defend.
Every criterion, weight, and edit kept on the record.
Models and people scored on the same cases first.
One rubric your team — and your auditor — can read.
Author once. Version every change. Every release is scored against the same criteria, in the same order, by judges who have already been calibrated on the same cases.
Write the rubric. Calibrate the judges. Score every release the same way.
Encode the criteria your reviewers already use. Weighted, evidence-gated, and versioned from the first save.
→Model judges and human reviewers score the same calibration set. Disagreement surfaces before a real release ever touches the rubric.
→Every candidate is graded against the same rubric. Scorecards, judge consensus, and reviewer notes ship with the release.
Every run leaves a record — the rubric that was used, the judges that scored it, and the verdict the team can defend.
Every edit kept on the record. Diff one revision against the next without leaving the page.
How aligned the model judges and human reviewers are on the same cases — before any real release is scored.
One read on what passed, what failed, and what every judge said about it.
Where the model judges agreed, where they split, and where a human had to call it.
Rubric, judge notes, reviewer overrides, and verdict — ready when someone asks.
Test the run against the rubric. Review the hard cases. Recruit the right specialist. Remember the misses. Approve what's right.
For the teams who stopped trusting the eval script.
See the page →Every issue. Every reviewer. One screen.
See the page →Every escaped failure becomes a gate the next release cannot cross.
See the page →Bring the rubric your team already uses. We'll version it, calibrate the judges, and make it the standard every release has to clear.